aka: do stuff that matters to the people who actually matter.

I’ve been thinking recently about what is wrong with most Social Media marketing efforts. At the Web 2.0 conference in San Fransisco Peter, Jeremy and Charlene gave their opinion about how to fix this.

The Owned Bought and Earned Media mix model has been useful for explaining why we need to move away from just buying media space, but it sometimes causes people to focus on the quantity of buzz, rather than the quality. The dreaded plague of viral marketing is a symptom of this way of thinking, where size of audience is everything. Consumer engagement is outdated if the aim is just reach: in that case it is really no different to the old PR models.

I’ve said before that great WOM marketing is actually not focused on the creation of buzz. Buzz should be the by-product of running a company in the right way, treating people right and making happiness your business model.

I’ve also been thinking about brands as planets, which do or do not have strong gravitational pull within their given universe. Let me explain…

 

brand_density

 

The diagram above shows how people get more valuable to your company as they get closer to the Core.

At the Core are employees: obviously vital to an organization, they should be your number one priority. The companies that do things right end up with an internal army of excited advocates.

Then there are rings of customers who start with the most loyal and vocal Advocates and the Fans. These people have strong emotional attachment to your brand. Marketing effort should be spent cultivating relationships with these people, energizing them, nuturing relationships between them.

At the outer ring is the gaseous layers of Flirts who may be buying from you infrequently, but they are disloyal and mostly indifferent to you. Bringing them closer to the Core is hard work, but building up too many of them creates a big empty brand lacking in Emotional Density.

Prospects float around on the outside, currently unattached to your brand emotionally. But, ironically, most marketing efforts are focused on them, rather than on the existing customers.

By focussing on the centre of this planet – by making your marketing deeper and more engaging – you are strengthening the bonds at the Core and giving your planet higher density.

Higher Emotional Density means more gravitational pull … more Social Gravity.

Asi Sharibi puts it well:

From a brand perspective you’re better off to reach out to as many existing fans as possible (these people already have a built in incentive to talk about you) and give them more reasons and tools to talk about you in a genuinely favourable way

In essence, this then becomes pull rather than push marketing.
 
It is about all the stuff I believe in: Community Management, building Tribes, making your brand itself a Social Object.
 
It’s pull tactics that would seem to be needed in the Attention Economy:
Add emotional depth to your marketing; engage people rather than shout at them; create bonds that matter at the Core. 
 
In essence: do stuff that matters to the people who actually matter.
 
After all, the alternative is just shouting and releasing too much gas…
 
 

 
“Campaigns spend — and often waste — thousands of dollars boiling down all of the issues into broad themes that can be used in both ‘paid media’ (political TV ads) and ‘earned media‘ (which recently replaced ‘free media’ as the favored euphemism for news).” 
  
—Jonathan Alter and Howard Fineman, “The Search for the Perfect Sound-Bite,” Newsweek, January 18, 1988
 
via www.earnedmedia.org (via @r2r0)
 
or, as we say in Finland: “Vanha!”

Google is my homie.

April 17, 2009

 
(aka a concrete way of explaining the value of social media involvement and marketing to people who don’t want to hear about Building your Social Capital with the Whuffie factor)
 
Most internet visits start with search.  People may have been motivated by an advert, or maybe just by a need (i.e. their phone broke and they need a new one), but their Consideration Phase almost definitely begins with search.
 
If Google is essentially each user’s homepage, one of our jobs as marketers should be to make the best use of that real estate.
 
Brands are getting better at driving traffic from Google to their own corporate pages, but I think many are not considering 50% of the Google real estate with “traditional” SEO and SEM.
 
 
google_social
 
 
So  (at least if I am a producer of a high-consideration product like a phone):
 
- SEM is, at absolute best, responsible for 30% of the clicks generated on that page (btw, I wonder if it’s a certain type of person that clicks there, like it is with banners). So I should get my fair share of these clicks by doing good, sales-driven SEM.
 
- Getting top position with great SEO means I capture about another 20% of the interest, clicking through to the “official” brand site.
 
- But the rest of Google is going to be full of social media, e.g. videos on youtube, product reviews, comparison sites etc.
 
Questions to ask myself:
 
What am I doing to fill up my “homepage” with interesting and positive content?
 
How do I measure this? Could I build a Search Engine Share of Voice score?
 
(ps I’m working on the answer to those questions next, but would appreciate opinions of course)